Thanks Jonathan. Regarding to the CI MTTR/MTTF test results, it varies from
time to time, and on master/stable branches.
1. it monitors new Linux kernels, so the CI job may use newer kernel version
than months ago?
2. What would be the criteria of MTBF here?
MTTRLast 7 Days0 ms
Last 30 Days12 hr
All Time3 days 21 hr
MTTFLast 7 Days0 ms
Last 30 Days12 days
All Time29 days
Standard DeviationLast 7 Days21 min
Last 30 Days30 min
All Time44 min
Regards
Hai
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Jonathan Rajotte-Julien"<jonathan.rajotte-jul...@efficios.com>;
Date: Tue, Nov 5, 2019 00:55 AM
To: "杨海"<hai.y...@magic-shield.com>;
Cc: "mathieu desnoyers"<mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>;
"lttng-dev"<lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>;
Subject: Re: 回复:Re: [lttng-dev] 回复:Re: 回复:Re: Pros and Cons of LTTng
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:47:58AM +0800, 杨海 wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> As you previously commented, “The current LTTng kernel tracer
(lttng-modules) supports Linux 3.0+ only.” and we can find the support package
list on http://packages.efficios.com/.&nbsp;
> Does LTTng have roadmap for upcoming new kernel versions?
I presume you are explicitly asking for RHEL & SUSE kernels. The current
packages for these distro are maintained on a best effort and commercial
incentive of EfficiOS. If you are interested in supporting this effort please
contact sa...@efficios.com.
As for the actual upstream kernel, we are monitoring [1] all new kernels and
stable branches.
[1] https://ci.lttng.org/view/LTTng-modules/
https://ci.lttng.org/view/LTTng-modules/job/lttng-modules_stable-2.9_build-vanilla/
https://ci.lttng.org/view/LTTng-modules/job/lttng-modules_stable-2.10_build-vanilla/
https://ci.lttng.org/view/LTTng-modules/job/lttng-modules_stable-2.11_build-vanilla/
https://ci.lttng.org/view/LTTng-modules/job/lttng-modules_master_build-vanilla/
Cheers
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev