Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-07: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Section 11.3 This section creates a new registry with an “expert review” review registration policy but does not provide any guidance on the criteria the expert(s) should use. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Section 11.3 The "IGP Flex-Algo Path Computation Rules Registry" specifies the ordered set of rules that MUST be used to prune links from the topology during the Flex-Algorithm path computation. Consider if the RFC2119 language needs to be here. This section shouldn’t specify protocol behavior. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
