On 23/05/2025 03:32, Aijun Wang wrote:

Hi, All:

I must point out that the updated draft doesn't address previous issues that described in [1].

Especially, the activation of flawed LSInfinity feature(there is detail analysis for this flawed feature that is defined in OSPF 2328).

And, some updated contents will deteriorate the traffic pattern within the network.

For example, It says: “ABR or ASBR MUST withdraw the previously advertised UPA when the reason for which the UPA was generated was lost”.

The above requirement will advertise the specific prefixes within the network, which will weaken the original summary effect, and attract the traffic via one or some of ABRs.

no, above is not true, the new text does not say to advertise reachablity for a summarized prefix, it only talks about removing the previously advertised UPA.

Please read carefully before commenting.

Peter


[1]: Reasons of abandoning UPA: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-reasons-of-abandon-upa-proposal/

Best Regards

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 [email protected]
发送时间: 2025年5月22日21:20
收件人: [email protected]
抄送: [email protected]
主题: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF.

   Title:   IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement

   Authors: Peter Psenak

            Clarence Filsfils

            Daniel Voyer

            Shraddha Hegde

            Gyan Mishra

   Name: draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06.txt

   Pages:   14

   Dates: 2025-05-22

Abstract:

   In the presence of summarization, there is a need to signal loss of

   reachability to an individual prefix covered by the summary.  This

   enables fast convergence by steering traffic away from the node which

   owns the prefix and is no longer reachable.

   This document describes how to use the existing protocol mechanisms

   in IS-IS and OSPF, together with the two new flags, to advertise such

   prefix reachability loss.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce/>

There is also an HTMLized version available at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06>

A diff from the previous version is available at:

https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06 <https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-06>

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:

rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts

_______________________________________________

Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to