Hi Med, 
The missing right paren will be in -38.
Thanks,
Acee

> On Apr 1, 2025, at 1:23 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
> 
> Acee,
>  Please fix this nit (because otherwise, mutual authentication part can be 
> confused with the examples):
>   OLD:
>    These protocols have to
>    use a secure transport layer (e.g., SSH [RFC4252], TLS [RFC8446], and
>    QUIC [RFC9000] and have to use mutual authentication.
>  NEW:
>    These protocols have to
>    use a secure transport layer (e.g., SSH [RFC4252], TLS [RFC8446], and
>    QUIC [RFC9000]) and have to use mutual authentication.
>   Thanks.
>  Cheers,
> Med
>  De : Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com>
> Envoyé : mardi 1 avril 2025 01:23
> À : Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com>
> Cc : The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ospf-sr-y...@ietf.org; 
> lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr <lsr@ietf.org>; Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org>
> Objet : Re: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-34: (with 
> COMMENT)
>   inline w/ [DC]
>   On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 11:01 AM Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Deb, 
> 
> > On Mar 28, 2025, at 9:30 AM, Deb Cooley via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-34: No Objection
> > 
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> > 
> > 
> > Please refer to 
> > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> > 
> > 
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang/
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> > Thank you to Corey Bonnell for his secdir review.
> > 
> > I do agree that the lack of narrative text makes this difficult to review.
> > 
> > Section 3:  If the template is changed (see M. Boucadair's review), then  
> > (or
> > Paul) will re-review this section.
> 
> I have updated to the RFC8407BIS template as suggested in -37.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis/
> [DC] This works, (other than comments I have on the actual template which I 
> won't bore you with).  TY
>  
> > 
> > Section 3, para 1:  If TLS is used, is mutual authentication mandated?  If 
> > not,
> > why not?
> 
> With the updated template, TLS is only referenced as an example of a secure 
> transport protocol. Talk to Med if you think this should be added to the 
> template.
>  [DC] the updated template does point to mutual authentication in the same 
> place that it says that secure transport must be used.  The wording isn't 
> ideal, but it is the template.  Hopefully it will be better going forward, I 
> have provided feedback to Med.
>  
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu 
> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
> falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to