Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-37: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


# Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-37
CC @evyncke

Thank you for the work put into this document as it represents nearly 10 years
of effort :-O

Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be
appreciated even if only for my own education), and some nits.

Special thanks to Christian Hopps for the shepherd's concise write-up including
the WG consensus and the justification of the intended status.

I hope that this review helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

## COMMENTS (non-blocking)

### SR over/for MPLS ?

I think that the right term is "segment routing *over* the MPLS data plane".

### Title

s/A YANG Data Model for OSPF Segment Routing for the MPLS Data Plane/A YANG
Data Model for OSPF *Extensions for* Segment Routing *over* the MPLS Data Plane/

### Abstract

Suggest to be consistent with the title, i.e., s/YANG data module/YANG data
model/

### Section 2

I do not understand the acronym in `Segment Routing (SRGB)` why not "SR" only ?

s/The ietf-ospf-sr-mpls *data* module/The ietf-ospf-sr-mpls *YANG* module
*defined in this document*/ There is no such thing as a "data module" IMHO.

### Section 3

Please add "MPLS" in the section title.



_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to