Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang-25: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Behcet Sarikaya for the GENART review. ** Per the GENART review and idnits == The document doesn't use any RFC 2119 keywords, yet seems to have RFC 2119 boilerplate text. ** Section 6. MITRE has approved this document for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited, with Public Release Case Number 19-3033 (Same comment as draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-37) While I appreciate the need to thank those that an author’s time, and that some employers have strict release review requirements, is the above text necessary and can it be removed? It implies that the named entity has authority to approve the publication of the RFC once the content is in an I-D (which it does not). _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
