Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A nice simple escape hatch for an exhausted flags space. Two minor nits in Section 2: - s/prefixs/prefixes/ - "Currently, no bits are defined in this document." Given that we're in IESG Review, it seems unlikely that this document will be modified to define bits further in the process. Drop the "Currently" and just state that this document doesn't define/allocate any of the bits. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
