On 25/03/2025 03:59, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
Gorry -
Thanx for your review.
In regards to:
“A TLV may contain information in its fixed part that is not part of the key.”
- Could this be an RFC 2119 “MAY”?
This draft is not specifying any encoding changes to any TLV (this is
explicitly stated in Section 4). The text you quote is simply a description of
what is the case for TLVs which have been defined by other documents - not a
normative statement about how TLVs are encoded.
I therefore think lower case is correct here.
Les
Then, I consider my comment of 2025-03-24 has been answered.
Thanks for the prompt reply.
Gorry
-----Original Message-----
From: Gorry Fairhurst via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2025 12:15 PM
To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-multi-...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org;
yingzhen.i...@gmail.com; yingzhen.i...@gmail.com
Subject: Gorry Fairhurst's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv-11: (with
COMMENT)
Gorry Fairhurst has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-
positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for writing this document, I have only one comment:
“A TLV may contain information in its fixed part that is not part of the key.”
- Could this be an RFC 2119 “MAY”?
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
