Hi Peter, > On Mar 5, 2025, at 4:33 AM, Peter Psenak <ppsenak=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> > wrote: > > Hi Acee, > > On 04/03/2025 18:58, Acee Lindem wrote: >> Speaking as WG member: >> >> I support adoption. However, it seems this draft could have been combined >> with the draft defining the flex-algo constraints for the reverse metric. I >> guess more RFCs equals better CVs 😎 > > not really :) > > I guess you meant the reverse affinity draf - that was first published 2 > years before this one came out. Although they both have "reverse" in their > name, motivations behind then are different.
I can see how they could be used independently. Thanks, Acee > > thanks, > Peter > > >> Thanks, >> Acee >> >>> On Mar 2, 2025, at 8:52 AM, Acee Lindem <acee.lin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> LSR WG, >>> >>> This starts the Working Group adoption call for >>> draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-reverse-spf-algo-01. Please send your >>> support or objection to this list before March 17th, 2025. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Acee >>> Co-Authors, >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
