Speaking as WG member: > On Feb 12, 2025, at 19:43, Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Robert, > >> With that I recommend to look a bit broader and count how many robust, >> scalable and production grade open source implementations have we seen of >> ISIS when comparing with the very same of BGP. >> >> I will let the reader guess why it looks as it looks .... why it is so much >> easier to take few BGP RFCs and implement at least some essential parts of >> protocol with required address families in a deployable way. > > > Let’s not let the reader guess. > > IS-IS is less popular than BGP. This should not be news. IS-IS has > competition in the IGP space. BGP has no competition. > > Show me the complaints from the open-source IS-IS implementors who cannot > figure out the spec. Based on that empty set, I don’t think that there’s an > issue.
For example, FRR https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/tree/master/isisd supports IS-IS. Thanks, Acee > > Regards, > T > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
