Hi Authors and WG,

I support publication of this draft.
I went through the 03 version and it is well-writen. I only found two editorial 
minor points such as "flield" in abstract and introduction section and 
"specifie" in section 2.
And it would be better to change the reference 
[I-D.ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce] to abbreviation such as [IGP-UREACH].

Thanks,
Quan




<[Lsr] IPR Call for WG Last Call on "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and 
OSPFv3" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-03
<Acee Lindem <[email protected]> Fri, 20 December 2024 18:26 UTCShow header
<This email begins a 2 week WG Last Call for the following draft: "Prefix Flag 
Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-03 

<Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by January 
11th, 2025. The extra week is to allow for the holidays.

<Thanks,
<Acee
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to