Hi Acee，
Thank you very much for helping to improve the draft. All comments will be
accepted and will be updated in the next version.
Best Regards，
Ran
Original
From: AceeLindem <[email protected]>
To: lsr <[email protected]>;
Cc: [email protected]
<[email protected]>;
Date: 2024年12月30日 22:21
Subject: [Lsr] Re: IPR Call for WG Last Call on "Prefix Flag Extension for
OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-03
Speaking as WG member:
I support publication of the document. The defined prefix option flag fields
and registries are required for OSPF extendibility.
I have comments both to improve the text and align it with existing OSPF
documents (see attached).
Thanks,
Acee
> On Dec 20, 2024, at 13:26, Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> This email begins a 2 week WG Last Call for the following draft: "Prefix Flag
> Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" -
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags-03
>
> Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by January
> 11th, 2025. The extra week is to allow for the holidays.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
