I also agree with splitting this work into two drafts.

Thanks,
Ayan

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 2:22 AM Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Speaking as a WG member, I support having separate drafts. Like Les said,
> this is helpful to allow issues specific to each of the proposals to be
> discussed independently.
>
> > I appreciate that it is more work to write/progress two drafts than one
> draft, but I think the importance of the extensions warrants the extra
> effort.
>
> For the chairs, we will do our best to facilitate the process, whether it
> involves one draft or two.
>
> Thanks,
> Yingzhen
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 9:01 AM Christian Hopps <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Aug 20, 2024, at 19:00, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg=
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Also, we are discussing modifying the “crown jewel” of link state
>> protocols – the reliable Update Process. It behooves us as a WG to do so
>> with a great deal of diligence. Having separate drafts allows issues
>> specific to each of the proposals to be discussed independently – which is
>> helpful.
>> > I appreciate that it is more work to write/progress two drafts than one
>> draft, but I think the importance of the extensions warrants the extra
>> effort.
>>
>> [as wg member]
>>
>> I support this position. I think the expansion of the scope of the
>> original draft is not beneficial to getting the either of the 2 things done
>> more efficiently.
>>
>> >  Finally, doing so voluntarily would immediately resolve the issue and
>> allow the real work of the WG to begin.
>>
>> Please.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris.
>> [as wg-member]
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to