Zahed – RFC 5029 was published in 2007 – years before RFC 7370 and the formalization of Expert Review as the choice for IS-IS registries. So I don’t think we should read too much into the choice made back then.
Don’t know if that will alleviate your sadness – but I tried. 😊 Les From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 9, 2024 4:41 AM To: Tony Li <[email protected]> Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>; [email protected]; lsr-chairs <[email protected]>; lsr <[email protected]>; Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]> Subject: [Lsr] Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-03: (with COMMENT) Hi Tony, Thats sad!! So we don't know why that IANA policy was selected but we know that is not useful anymore hence the update. //Zahed On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 9:52 AM Tony Li <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Zaheduzzaman, Unfortunately, the authors of RFC 5029 left us no note as to their motivations. Regards, Tony > On Aug 8, 2024, at 12:43 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-03: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for working on this. It seems useful change to me. However, I or the > reader would be benefited to know why this was "standard required" in the > first > place, then describe why it is required to be changed. > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
