Hi Everyone, I read through the draft and support its adoption. At first, the draft covers some cases that the existing RFCs do not cover. For example, RFC 9346 (RFC 5316) and RFC 5392 are for point-to-point inter-AS links, but do not support broadcast inter-AS links. This draft supports broadcast inter-AS links (refer to A.1. Figure 2). Second, for the cases that the existing RFCs support, the draft provides a more efficient way for these cases.
Best Regards, Huaimo From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Yingzhen Qu Sent: Friday, January 5, 2024 7:23 PM To: lsr <[email protected]>; lsr-chairs <[email protected]> Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes (01/05/2024 - 01/19/2024) Hi, This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes/ Please indicate your support or objections by January 19th, 2024. Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft. *** Please note that this is the second WG adoption poll of the draft. The first one was tried two years ago and you can see the discussions in the archive: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes-02 (ietf.org)<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/Li7wJsaY68gzJ8mXxff7K-Fy_nw/> Thanks, Yingzhen
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
