Given that the documents that provide the basic definitions needed for
this are still active Internet Drafts, it seems premature to last call
this document.
As a lesser matter, it seems odd that
draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices, which defines the terms needed to
understand this draft, is an Informative reference.
Yours,
Joel
PS: I considered not writing this email, as it seems quite reasonable to
use MT to support what I expect NRPs to be. So in principle I think the
document is a good idea.
On 1/10/2024 6:12 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
Note that we are last calling this informational document relating to
IS-IS deployment of NRPs using multi-topology. If you have comments,
please send them to the LSR list.
Thanks,
Acee
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *Acee Lindem <[email protected]>
*Subject: **Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of IS-IS
Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource
Partition (NRP)" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-06*
*Date: *January 8, 2024 at 5:50:21 PM EST
*To: *Lsr <[email protected]>
This begins a two week LSR Working Group last call for the
“Applicability of IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based
Network Resource Partition (NRP)”. Please express your support or
objection prior to Tuesday, January 23rd, 2024.
Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
