Speaking as a WG contributor: Hi Les,
I think a simpler name is better - perhaps ietf-isis-feature-support.yang with YANG prefix isis-fs would be better. Which brings me to my next and more important point… Like carbon neutrality, everyone at the LSR WG meeting who had an opinion thought such a YANG model would be operationally useful. However, I think the level of granularity is key. I believe that having a separate data node for each TLV/sub-TLV as was done in the example ietf-isis-pics-sr-mpls.yang module is way too granular to be useful. Rather, the YANG reporting should be done at the feature level. Also, does a distinction need to be made as to whether the IS-IS node supports the feature or both supports it and has it enabled (as would be the case for non-backward compatible features)? Thanks, Acee > On Nov 16, 2023, at 15:30, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Loa - > > I agree with you that simply "IS-IS Support" may not be the best choice. > Although, the meeting minutes have not yet been posted, as I recall my > response to Tony Li's suggestion of "IS-IS Support" was "Yes - something like > that." > > The draft authors have not yet discussed this - but we will and share the > proposed new name. > Other suggestions welcomed. > > Les > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Loa Andersson >> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 2:06 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [Lsr] Question on draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang >> >> Working Group, >> >> During the presentation of draft-qgp-lsr-isis-pics-yang there was a >> rather strong opposition in the chat against using the ISO-term "PICS" >> in an IETF document. >> >> I think the term "Support" was suggested (excuse me if I missed >> something), but I'm not that impressed, and would rather like to see >> something like - "Supported Protocol Aspects". >> >> /Loa >> -- >> Loa Andersson email: [email protected] >> Senior MPLS Expert [email protected] >> Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
