Hi Acee,
Understood. I do realize that there can be good reasons for differences between
the 2 documents.
Regards,Reshad.
On Tuesday, November 14, 2023, 01:22:23 PM EST, Acee Lindem
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Reshad,
Note that the SR encodings contain a lot of the same information but are
different in the two protocols. It wouldn’t be feasible to use common groupings
as it is more importation to be consistent with the data blocks that we are
augmenting than the SR extensions in the other protocol. If the IGPs were
exactly the same, there would only be one 😎
On Nov 14, 2023, at 12:17, Reshad Rahman <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Acee,
Couple of other differences (I didn't dig to see whether they are justified):-
Naming discrepancies e.g. TLV suffix is used more in OSPF (local-blocks v/s
local-blocks-tlv)
The LSDB models for RFC 9129 (OSPF) and RFC 9130 (IS-IS) are somewhat
different. It is more important to be consistent with the base models than the
other protocol.
- No global blocks in ISIS
IS-IS has global blocks.
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/isis:isis/isis:database
/isis:levels/isis:lsp/isis:router-capabilities:
+--ro sr-capability
| +--ro sr-capability
| | +--ro sr-capability-bits* identityref
| +--ro global-blocks
| +--ro global-block* []
| +--ro range-size? uint32
| +--ro sid-sub-tlv
| +--ro sid? uint32
+--ro sr-algorithms
| +--ro sr-algorithm* uint8
+--ro local-blocks
| +--ro local-block* []
| +--ro range-size? uint32
| +--ro sid-sub-tlv
| +--ro sid? uint32
+--ro srms-preference
+--ro preference? uint8
- No capabilities in OSPF
We have augmentations for capabilities.
Refer to
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8665#name-segment-routing-capabilities
Thanks, Acee
Regards,Reshad.
On Tuesday, November 14, 2023, 10:11:02 AM EST, Acee Lindem
<[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks Reshad - are there any other notable discrepancies?
Thanks,
Acee
> On Nov 14, 2023, at 9:55 AM, Reshad Rahman
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My suggestion is that authors of these 2 documents spend some time together
> to try to align the 2 documents. After that we can do YD review.
>
> Regards,
> Reshad.
>
> On Wednesday, November 1, 2023, 10:58:56 AM EDT, Reshad Rahman
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Background: those 2 documents have just been assigned YD review, I am
> reviewing OSPF and Jan is reviewing ISIS.
>
> Was an effort made to keep those 2 documents aligned/in-sync where
> possible/desirable? My expectation is that the SR specifics would be
> near-identical in the 2 documents. e.g. shouldn't the capabilities for the 2
> protocols be very similar.
> Here are some differences which don't seem justified:
> - sr-algorithm in ISIS is a uint8 and in OSPF is an identityref
> - range-size is a uint32 in ISIS and is a uint24 in OSPF
>
>
> augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
> /rt:control-plane-protocol/isis:isis/isis:database
> /isis:levels/isis:lsp/isis:router-capabilities:
> +--ro sr-capability
> | +--ro sr-capability
> | | +--ro sr-capability-bits* identityref
> | +--ro global-blocks
> | +--ro global-block* []
> | +--ro range-size? uint32
> | +--ro sid-sub-tlv
> | +--ro sid? uint32
> +--ro sr-algorithms
> | +--ro sr-algorithm* uint8
> +--ro local-blocks
> | +--ro local-block* []
> | +--ro range-size? uint32
> | +--ro sid-sub-tlv
> | +--ro sid? uint32
> +--ro srms-preference
> +--ro preference? uint8
>
> augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
> /rt:control-plane-protocol/ospf:ospf/ospf:areas/ospf:area
> /ospf:interfaces/ospf:interface/ospf:database
> /ospf:link-scope-lsa-type/ospf:link-scope-lsas
> /ospf:link-scope-lsa/ospf:version/ospf:ospfv2/ospf:ospfv2
> /ospf:body/ospf:opaque/ospf:ri-opaque:
> +--ro sr-algorithm-tlv
> | +--ro sr-algorithm* identityref
> +--ro sid-range-tlvs
> | +--ro sid-range-tlv* []
> | +--ro range-size? rt-types:uint24
> | +--ro sid-sub-tlv
> | +--ro sid? uint32
> +--ro local-block-tlvs
> | +--ro local-block-tlv* []
> | +--ro range-size? rt-types:uint24
> | +--ro sid-sub-tlv
> | +--ro sid? uint32
> +--ro srms-preference-tlv
> +--ro preference? uint8
>
>
>
> Disclaimer: I don't follow LSR...
>
> Regards,
> Reshad.
> _______________________________________________
> yang-doctors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
