I agree - though I don’t think this is a case of underspecification. OSPF virtual links should not be confused with OSPF adjacencies over tunnels and there shouldn’t be any need for the added text.
Thanks, Acee > On Sep 20, 2023, at 3:42 PM, John Scudder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Without commenting on the other aspects, > >> On Sep 20, 2023, at 3:34 PM, Tony Przygienda <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> 3. the MTU "largest datagram" needs to be errate'd to something more precise >> on top. > > Generally, errata are not the right way to fix “this is underspecified” kinds > of problems. The right way is to do a bis or an update. See also > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-errata-ietf-stream/ > > —John _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
