Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # GEN AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-terminology-07 CC @larseggert Thanks to Gyan S. Mishra for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/nivmH8c3YlgBr7JSoG7isGH1Vgo). ## Comments ### DOWNREFs DOWNREF `[RFC5243]` from this Proposed Standard to Informational `RFC5243`. (For IESG discussion. It seems this DOWNREF was not mentioned in the Last Call and also seems to not appear in the DOWNREF registry.) DOWNREF `[RFC5614]` from this Proposed Standard to Experimental `RFC5614`. (For IESG discussion. It seems this DOWNREF was not mentioned in the Last Call and also seems to not appear in the DOWNREF registry.) DOWNREF `[RFC4811]` from this Proposed Standard to Informational `RFC4811`. (For IESG discussion. It seems this DOWNREF was not mentioned in the Last Call and also seems to not appear in the DOWNREF registry.) ## Nits All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. ### Grammar/style #### Section 6, paragraph 1 ``` and all instances of "Slave" will be rename to "Follower". 7. Update to RFC ^^^^^^^^^ ``` There may an error in the verb form "be rename". ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
