Hi Barry, Looks like RFC Editor expanded the "LSP" abbreviation as version -26 (last before publication) says this:
* The IS-IS FAD Sub-TLV MAY be advertised in an LSP of any number.* IS- IS router MAY advertise more than one IS-IS FAD Sub-TLV for a given Flexible Algorithm (see Section 6). Rgs, R. On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 8:34 PM RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9350, > "IGP Flexible Algorithm". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7406 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Barry Friedman <[email protected]> > > Section: 5.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > The IS-IS FAD sub-TLV MAY be advertised in a > Label Switched Path (LSP) of any number. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The IS-IS FAD sub-TLV MAY be advertised in a > Link State PDU (LSP) of any number. > > Notes > ----- > I assume LSP is meant to refer to the PDU carrying the FAD, not a Label > Switched Path. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC9350 (draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-26) > -------------------------------------- > Title : IGP Flexible Algorithm > Publication Date : February 2023 > Author(s) : P. Psenak, Ed., S. Hegde, C. Filsfils, K. > Talaulikar, A. Gulko > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Link State Routing > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
