Hi all, First time poster here. Sincere apologies if I make any mistakes in etiquette. I work at Juniper, and am mailing on suggestion of Shraddha Hegde, after a conversation about draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo.
Having read the draft, I think I've found two tiny things to fix. The first is a typo: In the text "The following values area allocated by IANA from this registry for Flex-Algorithms", I think it should say "are", not "area". The second is a point of clarification in the text "The IS-IS FAD Sub-TLV has an area scope". I think perhaps this should be "level scope", not "area scope". For example, imagine a level 2 backbone that contains four areas. I would imagine the intended behavior is actually to flood this sub-TLV through the entire level 2 backbone, rather than just to the other routers in the particular area that the originator happens to reside in? Hopefully these are useful changes. Apologies once again if I've made any errors in this process. Best regards Chris Parker
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
