> On Sep 6, 2022, at 5:00 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: > > I guess if we do decide to either abandon the reorganization suggestion > altogether, or to pursue it as a separate draft, then > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles should just stick to its existing approach of > listing restrictions in their own subsections of the main spec, do you agree? > Recall that we got here (in part) because it seemed strange to me to update > the registry to list some restrictions, but not all of them. > > [ACEE] This would be my choice except I wouldn't add the "L2 Member Bundle > Attributes" restriction to the IANA registry unless we do it for all the > Sub-TLVs as you suggest.
We agree; that was what I meant. All or nothing, either do the whole reorganization (or whatever you want to call it) or back out the 05 change to the IANA section and just roll with what was in 04 and earlier. Halfway doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. —John _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
