Dear Authors, Thanks for this short, clean, document. I have no nits (!!) and only one substantive comment to discuss.
In Figures 2 and 3, you annotate all the sub-TLVs from the relevant OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 registries, to indicate whether those sub-TLVs are, or are not, applicable in the context of the L2 Bundle Member Attribute Sub-TLV. It seems to me that it would be helpful to update the registries themselves, to add a column with this information. In addition to making the information easier to find, it would also reduce the risk of future document authors forgetting to specify this information. (It’s all very well for your spec to say that future documents MUST supply this information, but such mandates on future document authors are hard to enforce consistently, absent some process. Updating the IANA registry would provide that process.) Related, the OSPFv3 registry now has three additional code points, beyond those you annotate. I guess you should update Figure 3 to specify Y/N for code points 30-32. Thanks, —John
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
