Hi Ketan

Please see in-line, thanks

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 6:59 AM Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Gyan,
>
> Please check inline below.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 8:21 AM Gyan Mishra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I support publication of this draft.
>>
>> The revere metric concept used for maintenance work is similar to the BGP
>> Graceful shutdown conceptually to de-prefer links to take traffic off the
>> box.
>>
>> I agree with Les that is the most important use case of all the use cases
>> in the draft.
>>
>> Ketan
>>
>> In our discussion about LDP-IGP sync and that use case not being
>> applicable as ospf  reverse metric is not applicable to LAN - Can verbiage
>> be added to the draft stating so.
>>
>
> KT> When the document is not applicable for LANs, I don't believe it is
> appropriate to discuss LDP-IGP sync aspects related to LAN operations in it.
>

    Gyan> Understood

>
>> I think an operational considerations section should be added to the
>> draft and can almost mirror RFC 8500 considerations.
>>
>
> KT> Sure. I will work on this.
>

     Gyan> Perfect

>
>
>> There are significant dangers to revere metric and care must be taken as
>> well mentioned in RFC 8500 that if an implementation makes reverse metric
>> default that could be dangerous for operators.
>>
>> Also maybe mention of OSPF multi instance RFC 6549 and any caveats
>> related to support of reverse metric.
>>
>
> KT> I am not sure how OSPF multi-instance has any bearing on this
> specification. Please let me know if I am missing something.
>

    Gyan> RFC 8500 had section 3.2 Multi-topology ISIS support on P2P links
so was wondering if multi instance with ospf may have any special
considerations just in case to check.

>
> Thanks,
> Ketan
>
>
>>
>>
>> Kind Regards
>>
>> Gyan
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:17 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> This begins a Working Group Last Call for
>>> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric. While there hasn’t been as much
>>> discussion as I would like on the draft,  it is filling a gap in OSPF
>>> corresponding to IS-IS Reverse Metric (RFC 8500).  Please review and send
>>> your comments, support, or objection to this list before 12 AM UTC on April
>>> 22nd, 2022.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Acee
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lsr mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>>>
>> --
>>
>> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>>
>> *Gyan Mishra*
>>
>> *Network Solutions A**rchitect *
>>
>> *Email [email protected] <[email protected]>*
>>
>>
>>
>> *M 301 502-1347*
>>
>> --

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email [email protected] <[email protected]>*



*M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to