Hi Albert, I agree that the draft is ready have started the WG Last Call. It’s great that we have two implementations. Thanks, Acee
From: "Albert Fu (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)" <[email protected]> Reply-To: Albert Fu <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 9:40 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <[email protected]> Subject: Re:Fwd: [Lsr] WGLC request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-04 Resent-From: <[email protected]> Resent-To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]>, Christian Hopps <[email protected]>, Yingzhen Qu <[email protected]> Resent-Date: Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 9:40 AM Hi, Could you kindly advise of the status for this request. Speaking as a "customer", we have tested this feature on Cisco ASR and Juniper MX platforms, and plan to enable this feature this year, pending SW upgrade. It will be good to see this as a standard so it is easier to get other vendors to support it. Thanks Albert ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Subject: [Lsr] WGLC request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-04 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Hi Acee/Chris, On behalf of the authors, I would like to request for WGLC for this draft. Thanks, Ketan -----Original Message----- From: Lsr <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: 22 October 2021 18:09 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-04.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD Authors : Ketan Talaulikar Peter Psenak Albert Fu Rajesh M Filename : draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-04.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2021-10-22 Abstract: This document specifies the extensions to OSPF that enable an OSPF router to signal the requirement for a Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) session prior to adjacency formation. Link-Local Signaling (LLS) is used to advertise the requirement of strict-mode for BFD session establishment for OSPF adjacency. If both OSPF neighbors advertise the strict-mode for BFD, adjacency formation will be blocked until a BFD session has been successfully established. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode/ There is also an htmlized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-04 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
