> On May 24, 2021, at 8:39 AM, Anoop Ghanwani <[email protected]> wrote: > > I thought that it might help operators and vendors think about these > components.
I would have no objection to simply enumerating the possibilities and noting the consistency requirement. Tony > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 8:33 AM Tony Li <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> On May 24, 2021, at 8:27 AM, Anoop Ghanwani <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I think it might be a good idea if the draft mentioned what delay(s) >> "SHOULD" be used. > > Why? > > It seems like this is local to a domain. The network administrator is free to > do as he sees fit and include whatever parameters make sense to them. As long > as the network is self-consistent, that should operate correctly. > > Tony >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
