Hi Acee,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]>
> Sent: 20 May 2021 11:28
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Christian Hopps <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-
> extensions-14: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On 5/20/21, 5:11 AM, "Robert Wilton via Datatracker" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>     Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
>     draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: No Objection
> 
>     When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>     email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> this
>     introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
>     Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-
> criteria.html
>     for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
>     The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/
> 
> 
> 
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     COMMENT:
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     Thanks for this document.
> 
>     In various places, this document references lists of numerical
> algorithm
>     numbers, or TLV Ids without any associated human names.  I would have
> found
>     this document to be a bit more readable if the names of the algorithms
> and TLVs
>     were also used alongside their numerical ids.
> 
> You mean like OSPF __?  For better or worse, IS-IS has always referred to
> TLVs by their numeric code point.
[RW] 

Ah, you can see that I haven't read many IS-IS specs.  If the convention is to 
always refer to them by their code points then that is fine, I just find the 
doc harder to read/understand.

Thanks,
Rob



> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Rob
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to