Hi, Qin,
 
Thanks a lot for your support. Please see some replies inline:

Chongfeng 



[email protected]
 
发件人: Qin Wu
发送时间: 2021-03-03 14:50
收件人: Acee Lindem (acee); [email protected]
主题: Re: [Lsr]WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment 
Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
Hi,
I have read this draft and It is well written and I support adoption of this 
work.
Here are a few comments and suggestions:
1.       What is VTN resource, how do we define network resource, is the 
resource a.       the label that is switched on the path of the LSP, b.       
is the resource physical resource assigned to LSP?c.       Is the resource a 
measure of the capacity of a link that is dedicated for use by the traffic on 
the LSP.d.       Is the resource referred to node or link in the network 
topology?Would it be great to provide VTN resource definition in the 
terminology section,[Chongfeng] The resource in this context is the forwarding 
resources (e.g. bandwidth and the associated buffer/queuing and scheduling 
resources). For detailed description about the resources allocated to VTN, 
please refer to draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments and 
draft-ietf-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn.
In addition, I also recommend you to reference RFC8413 for resource definition. 
[Chongfeng] Thanks for the pointer, we will take a look at it.2.       Section 
2 said:“The MT-specific Link or Prefix TLVs are defined by adding additional 
two bytes, which includes 12-bit MT-ID field in  front of the ISN TLV and IP or 
IPv6 Reachability TLVs.”
Does this require protocol extension? Are these two bytes reserved fields?  
Where MT-ID is defined? In which RFC? Also ISN TLV, IP/Ipv6 Reachablity TLV, 
where these TLVS are defined? Please provide references.

[Chongfeng] As this is an informational draft, there is no new TLV defined. The 
MT-ID based TLVs are defined in RFC 5120. The ISN TLV and the IP Reachablity 
TLV is defined in RFC 5305, are the IPv6  Reachablity is defined in RFC 5308. 
We could add some references and pointers to make it clearer. 
 
-Qin Wu
发件人: Lsr [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Acee Lindem (acee)
发送时间: 2021年3月3日 7:28
收件人: [email protected]
主题: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment 
Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
 
This information draft describes how MT could be used for VTN segmentation. The 
authors have asked for WG adoption. 
 
This begins a three week LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS 
Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - 
draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03. I’m giving it three weeks due to the IETF next 
week. Please register your support or objection on this list prior to the end 
of the adoption poll on 3/24/2020. 
 
Thanks,
Acee
 
 
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to