Hi Gyan, This draft aims to provide the protocol constructs to define a flex-algorithm which is suitable for sending high bandwidth traffic. Flex-Algo is a very useful feature for network consolidation use-cases which requires different metric-types for SPF. We are trying introduce the protocol constructs to simplify the use of metric based on bandwidth via Flex-Algo.
This draft does not attempt to do bandwidth management nor reservation like what RSVP does. For LDP based networks that use igp metric relative to bandwidth, Flex-Algo provides an easy alternate. Thanks, William From: Gyan Mishra <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, 27 February 2021 at 9:40 PM To: Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> Cc: DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN <[email protected]>, Rajesh M <[email protected]>, Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]>, William Britto A J <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Constraints [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi William & Co-authors >From first read of the draft it does appear your are trying to apply RSVP TE >PCALC path and reserve message link attributes constraints such as concept of >affinity bits to exclude low bandwidth or delay of individual links without >taking into account all of what RSVP TE is reserving of bandwidth in the end >to end path with the Path and Reserve message. As mentioned Looking at >individual links will not provide the end to end path view or bandwidth >requirements for the entire path to be reserved as accomplished by RSVP TE. As Tony and Robert have mentioned I agree this is a good first step but does need more refinement to make useful. Kind Regards Gyan On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 7:24 AM Robert Raszuk <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi William & co-authors, I read the draft and have two basic questions. 1. Both bw & delay can be used as defined in the draft to construct new forwarding topologies. But how practical such topologies would be in the real life when 40GB links may be heavily occupied with bursty traffic and 10G links can sit idle ? I suppose you are trying to address the case where say 12 gbps holographic stream needs to be sent across a network.. But then I don't think if sending it in a single flow instead of spreading into many sub-flows and use as much as possible ecmp would not be a better option. 2. Likewise how good is my accumulated link delay value if in between there are deep buffer network elements and say egress queuing to each link (which max is unaccounted for in your draft) can significantly alter the end to end delay ? Have you consider to add MAX_EGRESS_QUEUE_DELAY on a per link basis (still as static value). So if some traffic is delay sensitive we will have a much better accuracy not to get into a trap of queuing related delays. Thx a lot, Robert. On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 8:37 AM William Britto A J <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: All, We would like to draw your attention to a new ID: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-00<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-00__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!U3HBQwaZL7T4mjz-MUHE7VjFtnOyNghGDh5vwJXUXkHdMxlravmRvJwdZ8sz2YPxkw$> The draft talks about introducing link bandwidth related constraints in Flex-Algorithm which can be used to define a Flex-Algorithm based on bandwidth based metric. Please review. Any questions and comments are welcome. Thanks, William From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, 22 February 2021 at 10:56 PM To: Bruno Decraene <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Rajesh M <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Rajesh M <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, William Britto A J <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, William Britto A J <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-00.txt [External Email. Be cautious of content] A new version of I-D, draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Shraddha Hegde and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con Revision: 00 Title: Flexible Algorithms Bandwidth Constraints Document date: 2021-02-22 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 21 URL: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-00.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!QGg36p91zPfVMznYY91xs-zx70Qp5BE1nJx-Thnl14sTCkvwgOjEzjGBtD3v6TruoA$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-00.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!QGg36p91zPfVMznYY91xs-zx70Qp5BE1nJx-Thnl14sTCkvwgOjEzjGBtD3v6TruoA$> Status: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!QGg36p91zPfVMznYY91xs-zx70Qp5BE1nJx-Thnl14sTCkvwgOjEzjGBtD1VexjHPQ$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!QGg36p91zPfVMznYY91xs-zx70Qp5BE1nJx-Thnl14sTCkvwgOjEzjGBtD1VexjHPQ$> Htmlized: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!QGg36p91zPfVMznYY91xs-zx70Qp5BE1nJx-Thnl14sTCkvwgOjEzjGBtD3X5nPQbA$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!QGg36p91zPfVMznYY91xs-zx70Qp5BE1nJx-Thnl14sTCkvwgOjEzjGBtD3X5nPQbA$> Htmlized: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-00__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!QGg36p91zPfVMznYY91xs-zx70Qp5BE1nJx-Thnl14sTCkvwgOjEzjGBtD2aqSYcuQ$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-00__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!QGg36p91zPfVMznYY91xs-zx70Qp5BE1nJx-Thnl14sTCkvwgOjEzjGBtD2aqSYcuQ$> Abstract: Many networks configure the link metric relative to the link capacity. High bandwidth traffic gets routed as per the link capacity. Flexible algorithms provides mechanisms to create constraint based paths in IGP. This draft documents a set of bandwidth related constraints to be used in Flexible Algorithms. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/tools.ietf.org__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!U3HBQwaZL7T4mjz-MUHE7VjFtnOyNghGDh5vwJXUXkHdMxlravmRvJwdZ8vQC8uTvg$>. The IETF Secretariat Juniper Business Use Only _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!U3HBQwaZL7T4mjz-MUHE7VjFtnOyNghGDh5vwJXUXkHdMxlravmRvJwdZ8umPEf2Zg$> _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!U3HBQwaZL7T4mjz-MUHE7VjFtnOyNghGDh5vwJXUXkHdMxlravmRvJwdZ8umPEf2Zg$> -- [http://ss7.vzw.com/is/image/VerizonWireless/vz-logo-email]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.verizon.com/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!U3HBQwaZL7T4mjz-MUHE7VjFtnOyNghGDh5vwJXUXkHdMxlravmRvJwdZ8vByLZnBg$> Gyan Mishra Network Solutions Architect M 301 502-1347 13101 Columbia Pike Silver Spring, MD Juniper Business Use Only
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
