Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I wasn't clear on where the thread ended up from the Gen-ART review, but I'm nevertheless suggesting some text below to resolve the main sticking point. OLD If the router supports ELs on all of its interfaces, it SHOULD advertise the ELC with every local host prefix it advertises in OSPF. NEW If the router supports ELs on all of its interfaces, it SHOULD advertise the ELC with every local host prefix it advertises in OSPF. The absence of these advertisements implies that advertisement of the ELC is not supported. Not sure if that matches the intent though. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
