Bruno,

> Waiting some more details, as per you below email, the IS-IS receiver does 
> have a queue, sometimes dedicated to IS-IS, but in general relatively 
> dedicated to very important and time sensitive traffic to the control plane. 
> Details are indeed implementation specific. But in general, this queue is 
> designed to protect the IS-IS traffic from lower priority traffic, e.g. 
> burstyBGP.. So can we assume that the receiver have (or at least may have) 
> such a queue, and work with this?


That would be ideal, but probably not realistic. Not all implementations are 
going to have separate queues for BGP and IS-IS.

IMHO, that’s a very good thing, of course, but not all merchant silicon is 
quite that sophisticated. Yet. And it takes years to change, so it’s best that 
we proceed without.

Tony

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to