On March 24, 2020 at 6:44:50 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
> I posted a new version - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-11. It should have all > your inputs incorporated. > > Please let me know if you are ok with it. Once it's approved from your > side, I will update the OSPF draft. Yes, it looks good to me. I just have a couple of minor nits (below) -- no need to address them right now, you can wait for other Last Call comments. Thanks! Alvaro. 86 Recently, mechanisms have been defined to signal labels via link- 87 state Interior Gateway Protocols (IGP) such as IS-IS [RFC8660]. This [minor] Wouldn't a better reference for this be rfc8667? 90 In cases where LSPs are used for whatever reasons (e.g., SR-MPLS [nit] s/LSPs are used for whatever reasons/LSPs are used 149 assigned by IANA for EARLD-MSD. MSD-Value field is set to the ERLD [nit] s/MSD-Value field/The MSD-Value field 199 considerations as described in [RFC4971], [RFC7752], [RFC7794], 200 [RFC8491], [RFC7752], [RFC8662], [nit] rfc7752 is listed twice 265 [RFC4971] Vasseur, JP., Ed., Shen, N., Ed., and R. Aggarwal, Ed., [minor] Please take this out, and replace the references in the text to point to rfc7981. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
