On March 20, 2020 at 6:04:41 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
> please see inline (##PP2): We're good to go. The only comment from the original review that you didn't reply to is this: Besides the in-line comments, I want to point out here that this specification is incomplete. It needs to have (1) a formal description of the new MSD-Type (similar to §5/rfc8491), and (2) a discussion of the interaction with the BMI-MSD. ...but I'm assuming you're addressing it in the new text. Pointing it out just in case. Thanks!! Alvaro. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
