On 5/10/19 9:58 AM, [email protected] wrote: > In the current state of Segment Routing drafts, do you think it is possible > to advertise > Adjacency SID on such passive or inter-domain interfaces or do we need to > specify this behaviour > in a new draft ? > > For me I don't see anything in the drafts that prohibits this kind of > advertisement, but perhaps I'm wrong.
My understanding is that the SID is specific to an adjacency and advertised in IS-IS in either TLV 22, 222, 23, 223. As adjacencies will not be formed on a passive interface, an adjacency SID should not be advertised for the passive interface. I might also be wrong here, though. All Best, Chris _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
