On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:00 AM Christian Hopps <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think my email is being taken way too seriously. Please note it was "an > aside" > > Also I feel the need to defend Christian's code here. Did you check the > code prior to the comments? I don't see a lot of obfuscation, in fact I see > code for printing data for user consumption (e.g., id2str, etc), DIS > election, and it even includes jittered timers, which must means it's at > least half-way serious, right?. :) > > For a proof-of-concept project, I'd say good job. > > ack, you made me curious and I looked @ it. Yeah, I admit it's readable, quite clean code albeit AFAIS e'thing (obviously) massively hardcoded, one fragment, no CSNP, no PSNP processing or sending (and how does that work I was wondering or is he leaving the neighbor retransmitting forever ?) Even with that 1.5KLOC is very small ... interesting datapoint in itself and sorry if I was bit flipant, mea culpa .... --- t
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
