On 07/03/2019 18:16 , [email protected] wrote:
On Mar 5, 2019, at 1:31 PM, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:
Let me propose that we add something to sections 6.7.5, 6.7.9, and
6.7.11 like:
Addition of temporary flooding should be done with caution, as the
addition of excessive connectivity to the flooding topology may
trigger unwanted behavior. Routers SHOULD add temporary flooding in a
rate limited manner, if not configured otherwise.
Hi,
I haven’t heard any feedback on this. Can we please adopt this?
The draft cutoff is Monday, March 11. Could we please incorporate this
change and the addition of the pseudonode identifier by then?
I don't think there is an agreement on the LAN side.
Rate limiting we can add, but we can do that after March 11, I don't see
a need to do it before.
thanks,
Peter
Tony
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
