Les,
Lots of thanks, makes sense to me.
Thumb typed by Sasha Vainshtein
________________________________
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 10:48:43 PM
To: Alexander Vainshtein
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; Peter Psenak (ppsenak)
Subject: RE: [spring] FlexAlgo and Global Adj-SIDs
Sasha -
Although you raise a valid issue, I am not feeling any urgency here i.e.,
although the local protected use case is valid I don't see it as operationally
critical.
However, that's just my opinion.
If you want to pursue this I think you could raise the issue in either LSR or
SPRING (or both).
The gap in the architecture documents is less important than coming to
consensus on the importance of the use case. If there is consensus to address
this then I think deciding what documents need updating will just follow
logically.
Make sense to you?
Les
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Vainshtein <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 8:47 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-
> [email protected]; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [spring] FlexAlgo and Global Adj-SIDs
>
> Les,
> Lots of thanks for a prompt response.
>
> I fully understand that the current SR extension drafts are too far advanced
> for any significant changes.
>
> I also understand that Algo-specific Adj-SIDs require an update to RFC 8402
> because today it does not recognize any such entities.
> Therefore the discussion of use cases should probably start in the SPRING
> WG while effective the result would be "just" new Sub-TLV in IS-IS and OSPF
> with the actual work coming to the LSR WG.
>
> Any ideas as to what would be the best way to start this kind of discussions?
>
> Regards,
> Sasha
>
> Office: +972-39266302
> Cell: +972-549266302
> Email: [email protected]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 6:37 PM
> To: Alexander Vainshtein <[email protected]>; Peter
> Psenak (ppsenak) <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-
> [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [spring] FlexAlgo and Global Adj-SIDs
>
> Sasha -
>
> draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions is currently in AD review - and the
> companion OSPF document has already been approved and is waiting for a
> dependent draft to progress before publication as an RFC.
>
> It is too late to make significant changes.
>
> Further, while I agree with both your description and Peter's response,
> agreeing that this "could" be done is not equivalent to having consensus that
> it "should" be done.
> I think a more complete consideration of the deployment cases and the
> usefulness of such an extension should be discussed by the WG before we
> decide that we actually want to define such an extension.
>
> Les
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alexander Vainshtein <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 8:29 AM
> > To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-
> > [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [spring] FlexAlgo and Global Adj-SIDs
> >
> > Peter,
> > Lots of thanks for a prompt and very encouraging response.
> >
> > Do you think that the new Algo specific Adj-SID sub-TLV could be added
> > to the current IS-IS segment Routing Extensions draft, or should be
> > handled in a small dedicated document?
> >
> > Regards, and lots of thanks in advance, Sasha
> >
> > Office: +972-39266302
> > Cell: +972-549266302
> > Email: [email protected]
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Psenak <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 5:28 PM
> > To: Alexander Vainshtein <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-
> > [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [spring] FlexAlgo and Global Adj-SIDs
> >
> > Hi Sasha,
> >
> > On 02/03/2019 18:57 , Alexander Vainshtein wrote:
> > > Peter,
> > > Lots of thanks for a prompt and hivhly informative response.
> > >
> > > It seems that per-FlexAlgo Adj-SIDs can be useful even if they are
> > > local
>
> __________________________________________________________
> _________________
>
> This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains
> information which is
> CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have
> received this
> transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then
> delete the original
> and all copies thereof.
> __________________________________________________________
> _________________
___________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information
which is
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received
this
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then
delete the original
and all copies thereof.
___________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
