Greetings, Please disregard the previous email. (It was a test on a test server; further mails will not be sent.) Apologies for the noise.
[If you are looking for actual RFC errata, please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php] Thank you. RFC Editor/ar > On Sep 11, 2018, at 3:08 PM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4167, > "Graceful OSPF Restart Implementation Report". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://pubtest.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5367 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Priyanka <[email protected]> > > Section: GLOBAL > > Original Text > ------------- > OT > > Corrected Text > -------------- > CT > > Notes > ----- > Notes > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC4167 (draft-ietf-ospf-graceful-impl-report-05) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Graceful OSPF Restart Implementation Report > Publication Date : October 2005 > Author(s) : A. Lindem > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
