Hi Yingzhen,
thanks for your review.
As regards to first IDNITS warning, not sure about the first one, I took
the section "Requirements Language" from RFC8395 as suggested by Loa.
RFC2119 is only referenced there, that should not be a problem though.
I removed the reference to ISO10589.
thanks,
Peter
On 09/07/18 00:41 , Yingzhen Qu wrote:
Dear authors,
I have done shepherd review of draft-ietf-ospf-lls-id-04 as requested by
LSR chairs. I’d like to thank all authors for their contributions on
this document, also people who have reviewed this document and provided
valuable comments and discussions.
The document is well written and ready for publication.
IDNITS check found a couple of nits:
Miscellaneous warnings:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
** The document contains RFC2119-like boilerplate, but doesn't seem to
mention RFC 2119. The boilerplate contains a reference [BCP14],
but that
reference does not seem to mention RFC 2119 either.
-- The document date (July 1, 2018) is 7 days in the past. Is this
intentional?
Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative
references
to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)
== Unused Reference: 'ISO10589' is defined on line 200, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
'[ISO10589] International Organization for Standardization,
"Intermed...'
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'BCP14'
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'ISO10589'
Summary: 1 error (**), 0 flaws (~~), 1 warning (==), 3 comments (--).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Yingzhen
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
