Sabrina - Thanx for completing this.
Any reason why the last two codepoints > 22 Segment Routing Local Block (SRLB) (TEMPORARY - registered 2018- > 06-04, expires 2019-06-04) [draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions] > > 24 Segment Routing Mapping Server Preference (SRMS Preference) > (TEMPORARY - registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-04) [draft-ietf- > isis-segment-routing-extensions] expire on a different date from the others? I hope this won’t matter as we have passed WG Last Call - but just in case...??? Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 3:52 PM > Cc: [email protected]; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]>; draft-ietf- > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> > Subject: [IANA #1109980] Early Allocation Extension for "IS-IS Extensions for > Segment Routing" - draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16.txt > > Hi all, > > We've updated the expiration date for the following registrations: > > In the TLV Codepoints Registry: > > 149 Segment Identifier / Label Binding (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06- > 29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29) n y > n n [draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions] > > 150 Multi-Topology Segment Identifier / Label Binding (TEMPORARY - > registered 2016-06-29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29) > n y n n [draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing- > extensions] > > In the Sub-TLVs for TLVs 22, 23, 25, 141, 222, and 223 registry: > > 31 Adjacency Segment Identifier (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29, > extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29) y y n > y y y [draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions] > > 32 LAN Adjacency Segment Identifier (TEMPORARY - registered 2016- > 06-29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29) y y > n y y y [draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing- > extensions] > > In the Sub-TLVs for TLVs 135, 235, 236, and 237 registry: > > 3 Prefix Segment Identifier (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29, > extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29) y y y > y [draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions] > > In the Sub-TLVs for TLV 242 registry: > > 2 Segment Routing Capability (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29, > extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29) [draft-ietf-isis- > segment-routing-extensions] > > 19 Segment Routing Algorithm (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29, > extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29) [draft-ietf-isis- > segment-routing-extensions] > > We've made the following early allocations: > > 22 Segment Routing Local Block (SRLB) (TEMPORARY - registered 2018- > 06-04, expires 2019-06-04) [draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions] > > 24 Segment Routing Mapping Server Preference (SRMS Preference) > (TEMPORARY - registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-04) [draft-ietf- > isis-segment-routing-extensions] > > Please see > https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints > > Best regards, > > Sabrina Tanamal > Senior IANA Services Specialist > > On Tue May 15 17:12:25 2018, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi Amanda, et al, > > > > I just communicated with Les, one of the designated experts for the > > IS-IS TLV 242 registry, and the draft requires two additional Sub-TLV > > allocations: > > > > Sub-TLV 22 for Segment Routing Local Block (SRLB) Sub-TLV 24 for > > Segment Routing Mapping Server (SRMS) Preference > > > > Thanks, > > Acee > > > > From: Acee Lindem <[email protected]> > > Date: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 10:54 AM > > To: IANA <[email protected]>, Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> > > Cc: Christian Hopps <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > > <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > > <[email protected]>, Uma Chunduri > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Early Allocation Extension for "IS-IS Extensions for Segment > > Routing" - draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16.txt > > > > Hi Amanda, et al IANA, Alvaro, > > > > For a variety of reasons, we will not finish the subject draft by the > > end of June when the IANA allocations expire. It has just completed WG > > last call but there are many fastidious reviewers are in the path to > > completion. Please extend the allocations and add any that were not in > > the original early allocations. For example, we need the SRMS > > Preference allocated in the TLV 242 registry ASAP since we have early > > allocations to make in this registry. > > > > Thanks, > > Acee > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
