Hi all, I’ve submitted an updated version of my draft. Several changes:
- This collapses the two documents into one, so IS-IS is now included. Placeholders are there for OSPF. - I’ve expanded the discussion of failure modes. - Minor bug fixes. Your comments are solicited… Tony > Begin forwarded message: > > From: [email protected] > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-dynamic-flooding-04.txt > Date: March 27, 2018 at 9:01:30 AM PDT > To: "Tony Li" <[email protected]> > > > A new version of I-D, draft-li-dynamic-flooding-04.txt > has been successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-li-dynamic-flooding > Revision: 04 > Title: Dynamic Flooding on Dense Graphs > Document date: 2018-03-26 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 17 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-dynamic-flooding-04.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-dynamic-flooding/ > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-dynamic-flooding-04 > Htmlized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-dynamic-flooding > Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-dynamic-flooding-04 > > Abstract: > Routing with link state protocols in dense network topologies can > result in sub-optimal convergence times due to the overhead > associated with flooding. This can be addressed by decreasing the > flooding topology so that it is less dense. > > This document discusses the problem in some depth and an > architectural solution. Specific protocol changes for IS-IS, OSPFv2, > and OSPFv3 are described in this document. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
