Thanks, Acee. Hadn't considered RTG yet at all. Not sure which piece of the puzzle they would claim responsibility for...
Cheers Toerless On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:09:21PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Hi Lou, > > I had looked at the IETF agenda yesterday while we were considering this > presentation and your request for a swap of CCAMP and TEAS had already been > fulfilled - https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda.html > > So, given that this BIER TE Framework presentation is also being presented in > the BIER WG, IETF 101 attendees should have ample opportunity to consume it. > I won't even suggest it be presented in the RTG WG... ;^) > > Thanks, > Acee > > > ???On 3/7/18, 6:20 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Lou Berger" <[email protected] on > behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > FWIW TEAS, which clashes with LSR, is in the process of being swapped wth > CCAMP. I expect this should be finalized today or tomorrow... > > Lou > > > On March 7, 2018 5:22:59 AM Christian Hopps <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> writes: > > > >> Thanks, Acee - too bad. > >> > >> Very much a fan of creation of LSR. Sad that it meant moving from > >> two underused WG meetings to one WG meeting that does not have enough > >> time for new work. Reminds me of TSVWG. *sigh* > > > > Well now that's not really fair, is it? This is our second meeting, > first > > as LSR and we didn't run out of time in the initial joint session. > > > > Given that apparently you need to present in TEAS first anyway it seems > > like 102 is likely a better fit for an encoding presentation anyway. > I'm > > fine with you requesting a time slot in 102 right now if you want. We > can > > also put you on standby for 101 if we have any cancellations. :) > > > > Thanks, > > Chris. > > > >> Well, i guess all i am left with is to ask LSR WG members to attend > TEAS > >> on monday and hope my request for slot there will be successful. > Feedback > >> on the proposed topology model is important for the design. > > > >> > >> Cheers > >> Toerless > >> > >> P.S.: When are requests for slots LSR@IEF102 opening up ? ;-)) > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:44:44PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > >>> Hi Toerless, > >>> > >>> Unfortunately, we have a very full agenda already and are not taking > >>> additional presentation for IETF 101. Additionally, you're going to > need to > >>> present it in TEAS anyway due to their mandate... > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Acee > >>> > >>> ???On 3/6/18, 4:56 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Toerless Eckert" > >>> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear LSR WG chairs, > >>> > >>> I am hereby requesting a slot for LSR WG @IETF101 to present > subject draft. > >>> > >>> At the core of the proposed framework for the control plane of > BIER-TE is > >>> a proposed topology model for BIER-TE to allow path calculation > (and other > >>> consistency calculation) - distributed through the IGPs. > >>> > >>> I would like to get early feedback before we would start to work > on the > >>> actual encoding of this topology information into IGP LSA/LSP > types. > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> Toerless > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Lsr mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lsr mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr -- --- [email protected] _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
