oi Tony,
Obrigada pelo "shout-out"! mas  o artigo 'e meu e do Luiz Carlos Pereira!
espero que o site Academia nao tenha retirado o nome dele que na verdade
foi quem teve a ideia original.
Uma ideia que nos dois continuamos achando importante!
abracos logicos,
Valeria

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:08 AM Antonio Marmo <marmo.t...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Caríssimos amigos, mestres e colegas,
>
>
> Quando encontro um artigo de que gosto, faço questão de o divulgar. E este
> inclusive é de autoria da estimada Valéria de Paiva que participa desta
> lista. O texto encontra-se no sítio academia.edu.
>
>
> A Short Note on Intuitionistic Propositional Logic with Multiple
> Conclusions
>
> By Valeria de Paiva
>
> Manuscrito, 2005
>
>
> It is a common misconception among logicians to think that intuition-ism
> is necessarily tied-up with single conclusion (sequent or Natural
> Deduction) calculi. Single conclusion calculi can be used and are
> convenient, but they are by no means necessary, as shown by such
> influential authors as Kleene, Takeuti and Dummett, to cite only three. If
> single conclusions are not necessary, how do we guarantee that only
> intuitionistic derivations are allowed? Traditionally one insists on
> restrictions on particular rules: implication right, negation right and
> universal quantification right are required to be single conclusion rules.
> In this note we show that instead of a cardinality restrictionm such as one
> conclusion only, we can use a notion of dependency between formulae to
> enforce the constructive character of derivations.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Most problems of teaching are not problems of growth but helping
> cultivate growth. As far as I know, and this is only from personal
> experience in teaching, I think about ninety percent of the problem in
> teaching, or maybe ninety-eight percent, is just to help the students get
> interested. *
> Noam Chomsky
>
> --
> Você recebeu essa mensagem porque está inscrito no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos
> Grupos do Google.
> Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie
> um e-mail para logica-l+unsubscr...@dimap.ufrn.br.
> Para ver essa discussão na Web, acesse
> https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/A1F62497-5D44-4B84-87B3-224034452396%40gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/A1F62497-5D44-4B84-87B3-224034452396%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
Valeria de Paiva
http://vcvpaiva.github.io/
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~vdp/

-- 
Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos 
Grupos do Google.
Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie um 
e-mail para logica-l+unsubscr...@dimap.ufrn.br.
Para ver esta discussão na web, acesse 
https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CAESt%3DXsLW3cH_EG95G3ke_eXRHb16t_ruSKbt-XVXoZjCZwhzQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Responder a