*7. If somebody wrote an unjustly negative evaluation, it would be read by everybody who looked up the paper, thereby unfairly damaging the reputation of the author.*
The author would have the right to respond to responses, and if they could explain convincingly why the negative evaluation (which in any case is discouraged) was wrong, then that evaluation would get plenty of downvotes and the author’s reputation would remain intact. *IIusório. Não funciona assim, infelizmente. * 2011/11/13 Joao Marcos <[email protected]> > O medalhista Fields Tim Gowers fez recentemente uma proposta fantástica e > muito comentada aqui: > > http://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/10/31/how-might-we-get-to-a-new-model-of-mathematical-publishing/ > > Uma versão mais modesta, baseada numa recompensa justa ao trabalho dos > pareceristas, pode ser encontrada aqui: > http://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/11/03/a-more-modest-proposal/ > > Muito interessante mesmo. > Joao Marcos > > -- > http://sequiturquodlibet.googlepages.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Logica-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dimap.ufrn.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/logica-l > -- fad ahhata alati, awienta Wilushati _______________________________________________ Logica-l mailing list [email protected] http://www.dimap.ufrn.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/logica-l
