> muito interessante--estou aqui passando uma cópia ao Osmyr (CLE,
> ex-professor do DF IFCH) que tem  grande interesse  no assunto.
>
> Você teria  alguma referência ?

O artigo original no RSL?

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=8308791&jid=RSL&volumeId=4&issueId=02&aid=8308789

Abraços,
Joao Marcos

> Em 6 de outubro de 2011 14:47, Joao Marcos <botoc...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>> Pareceu-me que valeria a pena chamar a atenção para a seguinte linha
>> de investigação:
>>
>>
>> A FORMALIZATION OF KANT’S TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC
>> T. ACHOURIOTI and M. VAN LAMBALGEN
>> ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam
>>
>> Abstract
>> Although Kant (1998) envisaged a prominent role for logic in the
>> argumentative structure of his Critique of Pure Reason, logicians and
>> philosophers have generally judged Kant’s logic negatively. What Kant
>> called ‘general’ or ‘formal’ logic has been dismissed as a fairly
>> arbitrary subsystem of first-order logic, and what he called
>> ‘transcendental logic’ is considered to be not a logic at all: no
>> syntax, no semantics, no definition of validity. Against this, we
>> argue that Kant’s ‘transcendental logic’ is a logic in the strict
>> formal sense, albeit with a semantics and a definition of validity
>> that are vastly more complex than that of first-order logic. The main
>> technical application of the formalism developed here is a formal
>> proof that Kant’s Table of Judgements in Section 9 of the Critique of
>> Pure Reason, is indeed, as Kant claimed, complete for the kind of
>> semantics he had in mind. This result implies that Kant’s ‘general’
>> logic is after all a distinguished subsystem of first-order logic,
>> namely what is known as geometric logic.
>>
>>
>> Como podem ver abaixo, já há mais gente interessada nisto.
>> JM
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Grigori Mints <gmi...@stanford.edu>
>>
>>
>>        Logic Seminar Tuesday October 11
>>
>>        Time: 4:15-5:30
>>        Room: 380-380X
>>
>>        A formalization of Kant's transcendental logic
>>               G. Mints (Stanford)
>>
>> Kant's theory of judgements is a subject of extensive and active studies.
>> Kant's formal logic, on the contrary, is studied insufficiently and
>> usually dismissed as 'terrifyingly narrow-minded and mathematically
>> trivial'. Recent work by Theodora Achourioti and Michiel van Lambalgen
>>  A formalization of Kant's transcendental logic, The Review of Symbolic
>> Logic, v.4 no 2, 2011, 254-289
>> ([AvL] below) seems to refute this verdict. They propose a translation of
>> the philosophical language of Kant's theory of judgements into the
>> language of elementary logic and provide a convincing justification of
>> their view. In formal terms Kant's logic is identified with geometric
>> logic, a subsystem of ordinary first order logic that has been isolated
>> long ago in mainstream mathematics. The model has to elucidate a vast
>> array of statements by Kant like the following:
>>      "Thus, if, e.g., I make the empirical intuition of a house into
>> perception through the apprehension of its manifold, my ground is the
>> necessary unity of space and of outer sensible intuition in general, and I
>> as it were draw its shape in agreement with this synthetic unity of the
>> manifold in space."
>>
>>     [AvL] analyzes Kant's logic in terms of inverse limits of models, a
>> construction widely used in mathematics that reminds one of Kripke models (of
>> ``possible worlds'') or forcing, but inverts the direction in certain
>> sense.
>>
>>     We present basic definitions from [AvL] and translations of Kantian terms
>> (as many as time permits) into logical language. The  talk next week by Ulrik
>> Buchholtz contains proofs of technical results.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Logica-l mailing list
>> Logica-l@dimap.ufrn.br
>> http://www.dimap.ufrn.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/logica-l
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------
> Prof. Dr. Walter Carnielli
> Director
> Centre for Logic, Epistemology and the History of Science – CLE
> State University of Campinas –UNICAMP
> 13083-859 Campinas -SP, Brazil
> Phone: (+55) (19) 3521-6517
> Fax: (+55) (19) 3289-3269
> Institutional e-mail: walter.carnie...@cle.unicamp.br
> Website: http://www.cle.unicamp.br/prof/carnielli
> _______________________________________________
> Logica-l mailing list
> Logica-l@dimap.ufrn.br
> http://www.dimap.ufrn.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/logica-l
>



-- 
http://sequiturquodlibet.googlepages.com/
_______________________________________________
Logica-l mailing list
Logica-l@dimap.ufrn.br
http://www.dimap.ufrn.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/logica-l

Responder a