Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote: > Ceki Gulcu skrev: >> Log4j can also determine the caller as can logback. Logback can also >> determine >> and print the caller of the caller, or the caller of the caller of the >> caller. >> See http://logback.qos.ch/manual/layouts.html#ClassicPatternLayout and then >> search for the "caller" conversion word. The caller converter can be >> instructed >> to print the caller only when certain criteria are met as specified by an >> evaluator. >> >> > Do you happen to have measured performance of this particular aspect of > logback versus j.u.l?
Should be similar. Roughly speaking, determining the caller will double the cost of each written log. On some systems, it factor can be much higher. As I mentioned previously, logback can determine the caller of the caller (of the caller, of the caller, etc) whereas jul can only determine the immediate caller. -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch _______________________________________________ logback-dev mailing list logback-dev@qos.ch http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-dev