My goal is marketing and growing the project. I am looking forward to doing that 🙌
On July 31, 2014 8:37:11 PM PDT, "José Antonio Rey" <j...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >We are not discouraging anyone, just trying to focus in some goals. > > >On 07/31/2014 10:34 PM, Randall wrote: >> Marketing, having fun, and building interest in Ubuntu is within >scope. >> The wiki needs an update. >> >> If we are discouraging people from running Global Jams to do that, >then >> we are excluding some communities. >> >> Cheers >> Randall >> >> On July 31, 2014 8:31:02 PM PDT, "José Antonio Rey" <j...@ubuntu.com> >wrote: >> >> According to the wiki, Global Jams are opportunities where people >get >> together around a weekend to work together to improve Ubuntu. Of >course, >> this can involve an Ubuntu Hour done afterwards, but specifically >the >> term Global Jam is used for the dates where people unite to >contribute. >> This is why this topic is brought to the table. >> >> On 07/31/2014 10:27 PM, Randall wrote: >> >> And one just to gather people that simply love Ubuntu. There >is >> no rule >> that Ubuntu Global Jams must include work items. >> >> Just sayin... >> >> >> >> On July 31, 2014 8:25:03 PM PDT, "José Antonio Rey" >> <j...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> >> Then, it would probably be a good idea to analyze if it's >worth >> having >> two global jams per cycle - one for packaging/design stuff, >and >> other >> one for docs/translations. >> >> On 07/31/2014 10:22 PM, Michael Hall wrote: >> >> >> On 07/31/2014 11:16 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:39 PM, José Antonio Rey >> <j...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> >> I would be for doing it on the week of the 4th >> September. That way, if >> someone cannot finish something (as an example, in the >> documentation), >> they will have more time to finish. I am saying this >> because most of the >> contributions are to the docs, and the dates you are >> proposing are just >> one week before doc freeze. Any other ideas? >> >> >> I think the proposed dates are alright, and September 5-7 >> would be ok >> too (Labor day in US is Sept 1, so no conflict there), but >> I'd really >> rather see these Jams planned further ahead in general (too >> late for >> this cycle). Daniel's proposed date is after both Feature and >UI >> Freeze, making packaging jams and anything related to design >> not very >> useful if someone wants to contribute to this release - and >> having a >> package sit in a queue until the next release opens is >> really no fun. >> Doing it earlier in the cycle would still allow for great >> Testing and >> Bug jams, and squeeze packaging back in. >> >> >> >> We went back and forth on this. Having the jam earlier allows >> bug fixes >> and package updates, but it doesn't make sense for >translations >> or even >> a lot of docs (screenshots) if it's before UI Freeze. There >are some >> things that must be done earlier in the cycle, and some that >must be >> done later, so no single date would allow for everything. >> >> While the Docs team does appreciate having the Jam before >> freeze this >> time (thank you!), it does mean they only have a week to >> review the >> merge proposals before freeze, putting a bit of pressure on >> reviewing >> these in addition to any other last minute things that need >> to be >> (re)written. >> >> >> >> >> Michael Hall >> mhall...@ubuntu.com >> >> >> >> >> > >-- >José Antonio Rey > >-- >loco-contacts mailing list >loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com >https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
-- loco-contacts mailing list loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
