On 03/11/2010 04:33 PM, Danny Piccirillo wrote: > For me, the main challenge in explaining FOSS is that you also have to > explain what software is, and how it is created. > > > This is exactly what i'm talking about
When explaining this to people I use the analogy of a car: Many people
drive but do not care to fine-tune their own car. Often they will know
both the professional mechanic, and the enthusiast who can make anything
with four wheels do something marvelous. Then I ask "What if both the
professional and the 'hobbyist' had no permission to look under the hood?
What if they could look -- if they paid a fee -- but could not improve upon
the original model. What if they could not explain what they learned to
others?"
I then often throw in a bit about some of the proprietary diagnostic
software that mechanics pay for. But, I don't have a car, don't drive and
can only carry the analogy so far.
Still, for many people a light in the brain seems to flicker in response,
and we begin to have the glimmerings of understanding.
____________________________________________________________
[This message is digitally signed with the GNU Privacy
Guard (GPG). See http://www.gnupg.org/ for more info.]
____________________________________________________________
--
Kevin Cole | Key ID: 0xE6F332C7 (GPG/PGP)
Ubuntu Linux DC LoCo Team | WWW: http://dc.ubuntu-us.org/
". ! 1 |" -- Rene Magritte's computer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- loco-contacts mailing list loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
