On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Efrain Valles<effie-j...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > We have a very diverse LoCo Governance structure but most of them > converge on having a liason with the wider ubuntu community, call it > LoCo team contact. To request services and resources from the Ubuntu > project, this liason is the person (or someone acting on her/his behalf > with her/his consent) is the one that should communicate the needs of > the team. example (requests CDs, request mailing lists, web hosting, > etc). Does it make sense for this person to be the Team owner in > Launchpad?
No, I don't think so. Larger and/or more developed teams will frequently have a situation where a single individual is not the team owner, because that can be impractical and doesn't reflect the true position of the team. For example, I am the team contact for ubuntu-it. The team [1], which in turn is made up of quite a few sub-teams [2] is owned by the Ubuntu Italian Locoteam Council [3] rather than by me, because the reality is that I *don't* own or control the team. I'd be pretty reluctant to change that situation. [1] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-it [2] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-it/+members [3] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-it-consiglio -- Matthew East http://www.mdke.org gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF -- loco-contacts mailing list loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
